Below are resources about three broad topics: community rights in community-engaged research, critical perspectives on the engineering profession’s relationship with ‘the public,’ and science labs with an explicit community-centered commitment. Our list is incomplete. We would appreciate your suggestions and critiques. We will, of course, credit you for your contributions. Thank you!
resources
community rights in community-engaged research
Agarwal, A. 1995. Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge. Development and Change 26(3):413–439.
American Indian Law Center. 1999. Model Tribal Research Code. Albuquerque, NM: American Indian Law Center, Inc.
Assembly of First Nations. (n.d.). First Nations Ethics Guide on Research and Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge.
Association of Canadian Universities for Northern Studies (ACUNS). 2003. Ethical Principles for the Conduct of Research in the North. ACUNS, Ottawa, ON.
Association of Canadian Universities for Northern Studies (ACUNS). 2018. Research Excellence in the Northwest Territories: Holistic, Relevant and Ethical Research in the Social Sciences, Humanities and Health Sciences. ACUNS, Ottawa, ON.
Association of Village Council Presidents, Kawerak, Inc., Bering Sea Elders Group, and Aleut Community of St. Paul Island. 2020. Navigating the New Arctic NSF Comment (Letter to the National Science Foundation) (NSF) (March 19, 2020).
Averett, N. 2021. Making It Count: How to Achieve Structural Change with Community-Based Participatory Research Projects. Environmental Health Perspectives 129:6.
Beans, J. A., et al. 2019. Community Protections in American Indian and Alaska Native Participatory Research — A Scoping Review. Social Sciences 8(4):127.
Bering Sea Elders Group. 2019. Resolution 2019-2: Resolution Requiring Researchers and Funders to Engage Western Alaska Communities in a Co-Production of Knowledge Approach on All Research Activities and to Directly Fund Knowledge Holders, Tribes, and Native Organizations for such Efforts.
Boon, S. 2019. Asking Permission: Research in Indigenous Territories. Lady Science.
Bromley, E., L. Mikesell, F. Jones, and D. Khodyakov. 2015. From Subject to Participant: Ethics and the Evolving Role of Community in Health Research. American Journal of Public Health 105(5):900-908.
Brown, P., et al. 2012. IRB Challenges in Community-Based Participatory Research on Human Exposure to Environmental Toxics: A Case Study. In P. Brown, et al., eds., Contested Illnesses: Citizens, Science, and Health Social Movements. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
Brugge, D. and M. Missaghian. 2006. Protecting the Navajo People Through Tribal Regulation of Research. Science and Engineering Ethics 12:491–507.
Brunger, F. and D. Wall. 2016. “What Do They Really Mean by Partnerships?” Questioning the Unquestionable Good in Ethics Guidelines Promoting Community Engagement in Indigenous Health Research. Qualitative Health Research 26(13):1862–1877.
Callaway, E. 2017. South Africa’s San People Issue Ethics Code to Scientists. Nature 543:475-476.
Cargill, S. S., et al. 2016. Community-Engaged Research Ethics Review: Exploring Flexibility in Federal Regulations. IRB Ethics & Human Research 38(3):11-19.
Castro-Reyes, P., et al. 2014. Research Ethics Reconsidered in the Context of Community-Engaged Research: Proposed Revisions to the Belmont Report and Federal Regulations Guiding the Protection of Research Participants [Report].
Chief, K., A. Meadow, and K. Whyte. 2016. Engaging Southwestern Tribes in Sustainable Water Resources Topics and Management. Water 8(8):350.
Chilisa, B. 2012. Indigenous Research Methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Choudry, A. 2020. Reflections on Academia, Activism, and the Politics of Knowledge and Learning. The International Journal of Human Rights 24(1):28-45.
Clean Air Coalition of Western New York (CACWNY). 2010. Academic Research Policy.
Clean Air Coalition of Western New York (CACWNY). 2017. Clean Air’s Response to the University at Buffalo’s Tonawanda Health Study.
Climate and Traditional Knowledges Workgroup (CTKW). 2014. Guidelines for Considering Traditional Knowledges in Climate Change Initiatives.
Climate and Traditional Knowledges Workgroup (CTKW). 2015. The Ethics of Traditional Knowledge Exchange in Climate Change Initiatives. Earthzine (7/31).
Clinical and Translational Science Awards Consortium (Community Engagement Key Function Committee Task Force on the Principles of Community Engagement). 2011. Principles of Community Engagement, 2nd ed.
CMOS CONGRESS/MEOPAR ASM Town Hall Session. 2018. Risk Communication at the Local Level: Towards Meaningful Collaborations on Environmental Hazards [Panel Summary].
Contra*. 2020. Critical Design Lab Statement on Design Commitments to Abolishing White Supremacy.
David-Chavez, D. M. A. 2019. A Guiding Model For Decolonizing Environmental Science Research and Restoring Relational Accountability with Indigenous Communities [Doctoral Dissertation, Colorado State University].
Davis, L. F. and M. D. Ramírez-Andreotta. 2021. Participatory Research for Environmental Justice: A Critical Interpretive Synthesis. Environmental Health Perspectives 129(2).
Doran, M., C. Rhinesmith, and S. Arena, 2021. Perspectives of Community Partner Organizations in the Development of Ethical Service-Learning Guidelines. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning 27(1).
Engaged Michigan, University of Michigan. Principles for Community and Civic Engagement.
Flicker, S., R. Travers, A. Guta, S. McDonald, and A. Meagher. 2007. Ethical Dilemmas in Community-Based Participatory Research: Recommendations for Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Urban Health 84(4):478-493.
Fitzpatrick, E. F. M., A. L. C. Martiniuk, H. D’Antoine, J. Oscar, M. Carter, and E. J. Elliott. 2016. Seeking Consent for Research with Indigenous Communities: A Systematic Review. BMC Medical Ethics 17:65.
Gilbert, S. G. 2006. Supplementing the Traditional Institutional Review Board with an Environmental Health and Community Review Board. Environmental Health Perspectives 114(10):1626-1629.
Goering, S., S. Holland, and K. Fryer-Edwards. 2008. Transforming Genetic Research Practices with Marginalized Communities: A Case for Responsive Justice. Hastings Center Report 38(2):43-53.
Guerrinimary, C. J., A. Majumdermeaganne, J. Lewellynand, and A. L. McGuirea. 2018. Citizen science, public policy. Science 361(6398):134-136.
Henderson, J. N. 2018. Personal Experiences with Tribal IRBs, Hidden Hegemony of Researchers, and the Need for an Inter-Cultural Approach: Views from an American Indian Researcher. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 46(1):44-51.
Him, D. A., T. A. Aguilar, A. Frederick, H. Larsen, M. Seiber, and J. Angal. 2019. Tribal IRBs: A Framework for Understanding Research Oversight in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research 26(2):71-95.
Interagency Advisory Panel on Research Ethics. 2018. Research Involving the First Nations, Inuit and Métis Peoples of Canada. In Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.
Interagency Arctic Research Policy Committee. 2018. Different Ways of Knowing: Successful Examples of Knowledge Co-production in Arctic Research [video] (February 16).
Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE). 2020. Engaging Communities: A Role for Engineers?
Kahanamoku, S. S., et al. 2020. A Native Hawaiian-Led Summary of the Current Impact of Constructing the Thirty Meter Telescope on Maunakea [Preprint].
Kelley, A., et al. 2013. Research Ethics and Indigenous Communities. American Journal of Public Health 103(12):2146-2152.
Key, K. 2017. Expanding Ethics Review Processes to Include Community-Level Protections: A Case Study from Flint, Michigan. AMA Journal of Ethics 19(10):989-98.
Kwan, C. and C. A. Walsh. 2018. Ethical Issues in Conducting Community-Based Participatory Research: A Narrative Review of the Literature. The Qualitative Report 23(2):369-386.
Lewis, E. Y. and R. C. Sadler. 2021. Community–Academic Partnerships Helped Flint Through its Water Crisis. Nature 594:326-329.
Liboiron, M., A. Zahara, and I. Schoot. 2018. Community Peer Review: A Method to Bring Consent and Self-Determination into the Sciences [pre-print].
Little Village Environmental Justice Organization (LVEJO). 2017. Research Policy.
Maldonado, J. K. 2014. A Multiple Knowledge Approach for Adaptation to Environmental Change: Lessons Learned from Coastal Louisiana's Tribal Communities. Journal of Political Ecology 21:61-82.
Malerba, L., et al. 2018. Considerations for Meaningful Collaboration with Tribal Populations [The Tribal Collaboration Working Group Report to the All of Us Research Program Advisory Panel].
Martin del Campo, F., J. Casado, P. Spencer, and H. Strelnick. 2013. The Development of the Bronx Community Research Review Board: A Pilot Feasibility Project for a Model of Community Consultation. Progress in Community Health Partnerships 7(3):341-352.
Matsuoka, J., D. McGregor, and L. Minberi. 1997. Native Hawaiian Cultural Impact Assessment Workbook. In Energy Research Group, Inc., et al., Hawaii Externalities Workbook.
McGrath, M. M, R. E. Fullilove, M. R. Kaufman, R. Wallace, and M. T. Fullilove. 2009. The Limits of Collaboration: A Qualitative Study of Community Ethical Review of Environmental Health Research. American Journal of Public Health 99(8):1510-1514.
Memorial University. (n.d.). For Researchers: Doing Indigenous Research in a Good Way.
Memorial University. 2020. Indigenous Research Agreement (template).
Mikesell, L., L. Bromley, and D. Khodyakov. 2013. Ethical Community-Engaged Research: A Literature Review. American Journal of Public Health 103(12):e7-e14.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2014. Guidelines for Considering Traditional Knowledges in Climate Change. US Climate Resilience Toolkit.
National Research Council. 2014. Proposed Revisions to the Common Rule for the Protection of Human Subjects in the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
Rebecca Newberry (Executive Director, Clean Air Coalition of Western New York). [Conference Presentation] [Community Perspectives Panel]. “Public Engagement with Science: Defining and Measuring Success” Virtual Conference, Michigan State University, September 5.
Nordling, L. 2017. San People of Africa Draft Code of Ethics for Researchers. Science (3/17).
People’s Knowledge Editorial Collective. 2016. People’s Knowledge and Participatory Action Research: Escaping the White-Walled Labyrinth. Warwickshire, UK: Practical Action Publishing Ltd.
Prescod-Weinstein, C., et al. 2020. Reframing Astronomical Research Through an Anticolonial Lens — for TMT and Beyond [Preprint].
Quigley, D., A. Levine, D. A. Sonnenfeld, P. Brown, Q. Tian, X. Wei. 2019. Survey on Using Ethical Principles in Environmental Field Research with Place‑Based Communities. Science & Engineering Ethics 25:477–517.
Quinn, S. C. 2004. Ethics in Public Health Research: Protecting Human Subjects: The Role of Community Advisory Boards. American Journal of Public Health 94(6):918-922.
Research Data Alliance International Indigenous Data Sovereignty Interest Group. 2019. CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. The Global Indigenous Data Alliance.
Resnik, D. B. 2019. Citizen Scientists as Human Subjects: Ethical Issues. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice 4(1):1-7.
Resnik, D. B. and C. E. Kennedy. 2010. Balancing Scientific and Community Interests in Community-Based Participatory Research. Accountability in Research 17(4):198–210.
Resnik, D. B., et al. 2015. Ethical Issues in Environmental Health Research Related to Public Health Emergencies: Reflections in the GuLF study. Environmental Health Perspectives 123(9):A227–A231.
Reynolds, K. and N. Cohen. 2016. Beyond the Kale: Urban Agriculture and Social Justice Activism in New York City. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.
Ross, L. F. 2010. 360 Degrees of Human Subjects Protections in Community-Engaged Research. Science Translational Medicine 2(45):45cm23.
Ross, L. F., et al. 2010. Human Subjects Protections in Community-Engaged Research: A Research Ethics Framework. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 5(1): 5-17.
Ross L. F., et al. 2010. Nine Key Functions for Human Subjects Protection Program for Community-Engaged Research: Points to Consider. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 5(1):33-47.
Sahota, P. C. Research Regulation in American Indian/Alaska Native Communities: Policy and Practice Considerations. NCAI Policy Research Center.
Salsberg, J., et al. 2017. Engagement Strategies that Foster Community Self-Determination in Participatory Research: Insider Ownership Through Outsider Championship. Family Practice 34(3):336–340.
Shore, N., et al. 2011. Relationships Between Community-Based Research Ethics Review Processes and Institution-Based IRBs: A National Study. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 6(2):13-21.
Shore, N., et al. 2010. Understanding Community-Based Processes for Research Ethics Review: A National Study. American Journal of Public Health 101(1):S359-S364.
Shore, N, et al. 2014. Redefining Research Ethics Review: Case Studies of Five Community-Led Models. Seattle, WA: Community-Campus Partnerships for Health.
Smith, L. T. 1999. Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London, UK: Zed Books, Ltd.
South African San Institute. 2017. San Code of Research Ethics. Northern Cape, South Africa.
Stoecker, R. 2008. Challenging Institutional Barriers to Community-Based Research. Action Research 6(1):49-67.
Stone, R. 2020. As the Arctic Thaws, Indigenous Alaskans Demand a Voice in Climate Change Research. Science 369(6509):1284-1285).
Taylor, J. and T. Kukutai. 2016. Indigenous Data Sovereignty: Toward an Agenda. Acton, AU: Australian National University Press.
Tsosie, K. S., J. M. Yracheta, and D. Dickenson. 2019. Overvaluing Individual Consent Ignores Risks to Tribal Participants. Nature Reviews Genetics 20:497-498.
Tuck, E. 2009. Suspending Damage: A Letter to Communities. Harvard Educational Review 79(3):409-428 (includes Appendix “Resources on Tribal and Community Human Research Ethics Guidelines”).
Tuck, E. and M. Guishard. 2013. Uncollapsing Ethics: Racialized Sciencism, Settler Coloniality, and an Ethical Framework of Decolonial Participatory Action Research. In T. M. Kress, C. S. Malott, and B. J. Porfilio, eds., Challenging Status Quo Retrenchment: New Directions in Critical Research, pp. 3-27. Information Age Publishing.
Tuck, E. and K. W. Yang. 2014. R-Words: Refusing Research. In D. Paris and M. T. Winn, eds., Humanizing Research: Decolonizing Qualitative Inquiry with Youth and Communities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Vayena, E., et al. 2016. Research Led by Participants: A New Social Contract for a New Kind of Research. Journal of Medical Ethics 42(4): 216-219.
Wallwork, E. 2008. Ethical Analysis of Research Partnerships with Communities. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18(1):57–85.
Wax, M. L. 1991. The Ethics of Research in American Indian Communities. American Indian Quarterly 15(4):431-456.
Whyte, K. 2018. What Do Indigenous Knowledges Do for Indigenous Peoples? In M. K. Nelson and D. Shilling, eds., Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Learning from Indigenous Practices for Environmental Sustainability, pp. 57-81. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, S. 2008. Research is Ceremony: Indigenous Research Methods. Black Point, Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing.
Woodbury, R. B., S. Ketchum, V. Y. Hiratsuka, and P. Spicer. 2019. Health-Related Participatory Research in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(16):2969.
Wyborn, C., et al. 2019. Co-Producing Sustainability: Reordering the Governance of Science, Policy, and Practice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 44:319–346.
Wynberg, R., D. Schroeder, and R. Chennells. 2009. Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Benefit Sharing: Lessons from the San-Hoodia Case. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
critical perspectives on engineering & ‘the public’
Adas, M. 1989. Machines as the Measure of Men: Science, Technology, and Ideologies of Western Dominance. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Adas, M. 2006. Dominance by Design: Technological Imperatives and America's Civilizing Mission. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Anand, N. 2015. Leaky States: Water Audits, Ignorance and the Politics of Infrastructure. Public Culture 27(2):305–30.
Aspen Global Change Institute. 2019. Practitioner Led Urban Sustainability Workshop [Final Report]. National Science Foundation (NSF) Sustainable Urban Systems (SUS) Workshop, Ann Arbor, MI, July 8-10, 2019.
Bielefeldt, A. R. 2018. Professional Social Responsibility in Engineering. Social Responsibility, Ingrid Muenstermann, IntechOpen: 41-60.
Blue, E., M. Levine, and D. Nieusma. 2013. Engineering and War: Militarism, Ethics, Institutions, Alternatives. San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool.
Boucher, J. L., A. M. Levenda, J. Morales‐Guerrero, M. M. Macias, and D. M. A. Karwat. 2020. Establishing a Field of Collaboration for Engineers, Scientists, and Community Groups: Incentives, Barriers, and Potential. Earth's Future 8(10).
Cech, E. A. 2014. Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education? Science, Technology, & Human Values 39(1):42-72.
Chen, D. A., J. A. Mejia, and S. Breslin. 2019. Navigating Equity Work in Engineering: Contradicting Messages Encountered by Minority Faculty. Digital Creativity.
de Wilde, M. 2020. “A Heat Pump Needs a Bit of Care”: On Maintainability and Repairing Gender–Technology Relations. Science, Technology, & Human Values.
Dhillon, C. M. 2020. Indigenous Feminisms: Disturbing Colonialism in Environmental Science Partnerships. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity.
Easterly, W. 2006. The White Man's Burden: Why the West's Efforts to Aid the Rest Have Done So Much Ill and So Little Good. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
Estes, N. 2019. Our History is the Future: Standing Rock versus the Dakota Access Pipeline, and the Long Tradition of Indigenous Resistance. London, UK & Brooklyn, NY: Verso.
Flint Resident Complaint Request Letter to the Scientific and Engineering Communities, 2018
Freshwater for Life Action Coalition (FLAC) Board of Directors. 2019. Award of Herbert Hoover Humanitarian Medal Deepens Divide Between the Engineering Establishment & Environmental Justice Communities. KINGFISHmke (10/12).
Gibbs, L. 1994. Risk Assessments from a Community Perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 14(5-6):327-335.
Hammer, M. 1995. Why Projects Fail. Culture and Agriculture: Orientation Texts [Report], pp. 19-22. UNESCO.
Harsh, M., M. J. Bernstein, J. Wetmore, S. Cozzens, T. Woodson, and R. Castillo. 2017. Preparing Engineers for the Challenges of Community Engagement. European Journal of Engineering Education 42(6):1154–1173.
Headrick, D. R. 1988. The Tentacles of Progress: Technology Transfer in the Age of Imperialism, 1850-1940. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Hicks, B., E. Y. Lewis, and N. Love. 2021. Closing America’s Racial Gap around Drinking Water Quality Perceptions and the Role of the Environmental Engineering and Science Academic Community. Environmental Science & Technology Water 1(2):459-460.
Jackson, J. T. 2005. The Globalizers: Development Workers in Action. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Lambrinidou, Y. 2020. Terms of Engagement: Towards Community Rights and Protections [Community Engagement Panel]. “Public Engagement with Science: Defining and Measuring Success” Virtual Conference, Michigan State University, September 5.
Lambrinidou, Y. 2016. On Listening, Science, and Justice: A Call for Exercising Care in What Lessons We Draw from Flint. Environmental Science & Technology 50(22):12058-12059.
Lambrinidou, Y. 2019. When Technical Experts Set Out to “Do Good”: Deficit-Based Constructions of “the Public” and the Moral Imperative for New Visions of Engagement [invited editorial]. Michigan Journal of Sustainability 6(1):7-16.
Lambrinidou, Y. and N. E. Canney. 2017. Engineers’ Imaginaries of “the Public”: Content Analysis of Foundational Professional Documents, 124th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Conference Proceedings (Paper ID #18325), June 25-28, Columbus, OH.
Leydens, J. A. and J. C. Lucena. 2018. Engineering Justice: Transforming Engineering Education and Practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Leydens, J. A. and J. C. Lucena. 2009. Listening as a Missing Dimension in Engineering Education: Implications for Sustainable Community Development Efforts. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 52(4):359-376.
Leydens, J. A. and J. C. Lucena. 2014. Social Justice: A Missing, Unelaborated Dimension in Humanitarian Engineering and Learning Through Service. International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering 9(2):1-28.
Lucena, J., J. Schneider, and J. A. Leydens. 2010. Engineering and Sustainable Community Development. San Rafael, CA: Morgan & Claypool Publishers.
Mazzurco, A. and B. K. Jesiek. 2014. Learning from Failure: Developing a Typology to Enhance Global Service-Learning Engineering Projects (Paper ID #10075). 121st Annual Conference and Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Indianapolis, IN, June 15-18.
Mitcham, C. 2009. A Philosophical Inadequacy of Engineering. The Monist 92(3):339-356.
Nieusma, D. and D. Riley. 2010. Designs on Development: Engineering, Globalization, and Social Justice. Engineering Studies 2(1):29-59.
Ottinger, G. and B. Cohen. 2012. Environmentally Just Transformations of Expert Cultures: Toward the Theory and Practice of a Renewed Science and Engineering. Environmental Justice 5(3):158-163.
Ottinger, G. and B. R. Cohen, eds. 2011. Technoscience and Environmental Justice: Expert Cultures in a Grassroots Movement. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Pandya, R. E. 2014. Community-Driven Research in the Anthropocene. In D. Dalbotten, ed., Future Earth: Advancing Civic Understanding of the Anthropocene, pp. 53-66. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union.
Pauli, B. J. 2019. Flint Fights Back: Environmental Justice and Democracy in the Flint Water Crisis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Pauli, B. 2020. [Conference Presentation] [Community Perspectives Panel]. “Public Engagement with Science: Defining and Measuring Success” Virtual Conference, Michigan State University, September 5.
Phillips, C. M. L., Y. E. Pearson, L. M. Black, Q. G. Alexander. 2018. The American Society of Civil Engineers’ Canon 8: Codifying Diversity as Ethics. 125th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition, Conference Proceedings (Paper ID #21970), June 24-27, Salt Lake City, UT.
Riley, D. 2008. Engineering and Social Justice. San Rafael, CA: Morgan and Claypool.
Riley, D. M. and Y. Lambrinidou. 2015. Canons Against Cannons? Social Justice and the Engineering Ethics Imaginary (Paper ID #12542). 122nd Annual Conference and Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), Seattle, WA, June 14-17.
Roth, D., R. Boelens, and M. Zwarteveen. 2015. Property, Legal Pluralism, and Water Rights: The Critical Analysis of Water Governance and the Politics of Recognizing “Local” Rights. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 47(3):456-475.
Schneider, A. and D. McCumber. 2004. An Air That Kills: How the Asbestos Poisoning of Libby, Montana, Uncovered a National Scandal. New York, NY: Berkley Books.
Schneider, J., J. Lucena, and J. A. Leydens. 2009. Engineering to Help: The Value of Critique in Engineering Service. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine:42-48.
Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Vandersteen, D. J., C. A. Baillie, and K. R. Hall. 2009. International Humanitarian Engineering: Who Benefits and Who Pays? IEEE Technology and Society Magazine:32–41.
Williams, J. M. 2004. Technological Paternalism. ASEE Prism 14(4):72.
Wisnioski, M. 2012. Engineers for Change: Competing Visions of Technology in 1960s America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zwarteveen, M. 2017. Hydrocracies, Engineers and Power: Questioning Masculinities in Water. Engineering Studies 9(2):78-94.
Zwarteveen, M. 2015. Regulating Water, Ordering Society: Practices and Politics of Water Governance. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Zwarteveen, M. 2011. Questioning Masculinities in Water. Economic and Political Weekly 46(18):40-48.
science labs with an explicit community-centered commitment
CLEAR, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada
Dark Laboratory, Ithaca, NY
Just Environments Lab, Boulder, Colorado
Native BioData Consortium, South Dakota
Public Lab, Brooklyn, New York
SKC Indigenous Research Center, Pablo, Montana
Technoscience Research Unit, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Unama'ki Institute, Eskasoni, Nova Scotia, Canada